The Encounter with the Identical Other
The Literary Double as a Manifestation of Failure in Self-Constitution
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 20249257 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Michal Tal (0009-0000-2031-0581, Technion – Israel Institute of Technology, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2018 |
| Volume | 7 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 13 |
| Publication date | 2018-01-29 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Humanities (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2076-0787 • E-ISSN: 2076-0787 |
| Publisher | MDPI AG (PUBLISHER • IT) |
| DOI | 10.3390/h7010013 |
| OpenAlex | W2791406426 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 3 |
Literary pieces featuring the double depict an encounter between the protagonist and another person, who is her identical other. Therefore they face various difficulties related to a threat cast on their unique identity, and this encounter challenges their process of self-definition. Martin Buber sees the existence of the other as essential for the occurrence of self-constitution within an individual. He maintains that any person needs another person to obtain confirmation of what she is and is born equipped with the ability to confirm her fellow-person in the same way (1959). However, as the other encountered by a doppelgänger protagonist is not truly “other”, the latter might confront a difficulty in the different stages of Buber’s self-constitution process. This paper seeks to shed light on the inter- and intra-personal relationships depicted in literary pieces focusing on the theme of the double, such as The Double (Dostoyevsky [1846] 1997; Saramago 2002), Despair (1965), and Too Much Nina (Orbach 2011), emphasizing the limitations cast by the encounter with the identical other on the protagonist’s self-constitution, as put forward by Buber
Aesthetics · Art · Constitution · Epistemology · Linguistics · Literature · Political science · Psychoanalysis · Self · Sociology · Computer Science · Law · Philosophy · Psychology · Scientific Research and Philosophical Inquiry
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |