Not parts, but holistic totality. Comment on Streib’s “xenosophia”
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 20254580 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Eeva K Kallio (0000-0003-3950-6554, University of Jyväskylä, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 2 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 203-207 |
| Publication date | 2024-06-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Possibility Studies & Society (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2753-8699 • E-ISSN: 2753-8699 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/27538699241241556 |
| OpenAlex | W4393262683 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 6 |
Recent research shows that there seems to be some preliminary agreement of the definition of wisdom. Two main strands of wisdom research can be identified. On the one hand, it is suggested that wisdom is attained through life experience and self-reflection as a deep self-understanding. On the other hand, multi-perspective openness, flexibility, and orientation toward others are signs of wisdom. Thus, both external and internal realms of the mind are included in the definitions. Streib (2024) emphasizes the latter, as perspective-taking, intellectual humility, moral concern for others are the characteristics of wisdom, and he calls it “xenosophia.” I argue that it is impossible to define wisdom in this way alone, since psychological self-understanding is necessarily required. If there is no inner human change, there can be no outer social change. Both dimensions are necessary in a holistic understanding of wisdom
Epistemology · Computer Science · Italian Fascism and Post-war Society · Law in Society and Culture · Philosophy · Semiotics and Representation Studies
| Unique citing works | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0.5 |
| Citation span | 2024 - 2024 (1) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 1 |