Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The "Cannot Decide" Option in Thurstone-Type Attitude Scales

Bibliographic Data

ID20283445
AuthorsTheodore M Madden (Oregon State University), Frederick J Klopfer (Oregon State University)
Year1978
Volume38
Issue2
Pages259-264
Publication date1978-07-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueEducational and Psychological Measurement (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0013-1644 • E-ISSN: 1552-3888
PublisherSAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/001316447803800207
OpenAlexW2019704955
LanguageEN
Citations received6
References cited5

Sociology students were administered two Thurstone-type attitude scales (Capital Punishment and Sunday Observance), each under two conditions (with and without the option of responding"?" for "Cannot Decide"), and a measure of Ambiguity Tolerance. When available, "?" was used by a slight majority of subjects on both scales. The use of "?" was not found to be related to scores on the measure of ambiguity tolerance. Correlations between "?" and "no?" administrations were significant, and significantly stronger for Capital Punishment than for Sunday Observance, but means did not differ significantly between conditions, and mean differences did not differ significantly between scales. More use of "?" appeared in the Capital Punishment scale than in the Sunday Observance scale but "?" substituted fairly evenly for "Agree" and "Disagree" in Capital Punishment, while in Sunday Observance "?" substituted mainly for "Disagree." Allowance for "?" is recommended. Observed differences are discussed in terms of assimilation-contrast theory, mainly the constructs of statement-attitude congruity, involvement with the attitude object, strength of the attitude, and development of the attitude

Ambiguity · Capital (architecture) · Capital punishment · Criminology · Developmental psychology · Punishment (psychology) · Scale (ratio) · Thurstone scale · Psychology · Social and Intergroup Psychology · Social Psychology

  • Effects of work-family and family-work conflict and guilt on job and life satisfaction

    Open Access•Cátia Sousa, Ezequiel Pinto et al.•Polish Psychological Bulletin•2021

  • Concerning Trends in Likert Scale Usage in Human-robot Interaction

    Open Access•Mariah Schrum, Muyleng Ghuy et al.•ACM Transactions on Human-Robot…•2023

  • The Impact of Midpoint Responses and Reverse Coding on Survey Data

    Gail H Weems, Anthony J Onwuegbuzie•Measurement and Evaluation in…•2001

  • Portuguese Mothers and Fathers Share Similar Levels of Work-Family Guilt According to a Newly Validated Measure

    Open Access•Gabriela Gonçalves, Cátia Sousa et al.•Sex Roles•2017

  • Understanding the Relation Between Attitude Involvement and Response Latitude Using Item Response Theory

    Open Access•Christopher J Lake, Scott Withrow et al.•Educational and Psychological…•2013

  • The Alcohol-related Aggression Questionnaire

    Mary Mcmurran, Vincent Egan et al.•Addiction Research & Theory•2006

  • Measurement of Ambiguity Tolerance

    Robert W Norton•Journal of Personality Assessment•1975

  • Ambivalence in Attitude Measurement

    Open Access•Michael Moore•Educational and Psychological…•1973

  • Fictitious Groups and the Generality of Prejudice

    Open Access•Herbert C Fink•Psychological Reports•1971

Citations per year0.24
Citation span2001 - 2023 (23)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae