Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

On the Benefits of Using Maximal Reliability in Educational and Behavioral Research

Bibliographic Data

ID20283952
AuthorsTenko Raykov (0000-0002-8911-5116, Michigan State University, East Lansing, USA, corresponding author)
Year2024
Volume84
Issue5
Pages994-1011
Publication date2024-10-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueEducational and Psychological Measurement (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0013-1644 • E-ISSN: 1552-3888
PublisherSAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/00131644231215771
PMID39318478
OpenAlexW4390273513
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited13

This note is concerned with the benefits that can result from the use of the maximal reliability and optimal linear combination concepts in educational and psychological research. Within the widely used framework of unidimensional multi-component measuring instruments, it is demonstrated that the linear combination of their components that possesses the highest possible reliability can exhibit a level of consistency considerably exceeding that of their overall sum score that is nearly routinely employed in contemporary empirical research. This optimal linear combination can be particularly useful in circumstances where one or more scale components are associated with relatively large error variances, but their removal from the instrument can lead to a notable loss in validity due to construct underrepresentation. The discussion is illustrated with a numerical example

Component (thermodynamics) · Consistency (knowledge bases) · Construct (python library) · Econometrics · Empirical research · Internal consistency · Psychometrics · Reliability (semiconductor) · Reliability engineering · Scale (ratio) · Statistics · Artificial Intelligence · Computer Science · Early Childhood Education and Development · Engineering · Mathematics · Psychology · Psychometric Methodologies and Testing · School Choice and Performance

  • A critique of the perception parameter used in the ranking of higher education institutions

    Atul Kumar, Rijwan Shaikh et al.•Quality in Higher Education•2026

  • Evaluation of Maximal Reliability for Multidimensional Measuring Instruments Using Structural Equation Modeling

    Tenko Raykov, Bingsheng Zhang•Structural Equation Modeling: A…•2024

  • Overestimation of Internal Consistency by Coefficient Omega in Data Giving Rise to a Centroid-Like Factor Solution

    Open Access•Karl Schweizer, Tengfei Wang et al.•Educational and Psychological…•2025

  • An Introduction to the Bootstrap

    Open Access•Bradley Efron, Robert J Tibshirani et al.•An Introduction to the Bootstrap•1993

  • Beyond SEM

    Open Access•Bengt Muthén, Bengt O Muthén•Behaviormetrika•2002

  • "General Intelligence," Objectively Determined and Measured

    C Spearman•The American Journal of Psychology•1904

  • Foundations of Factor Analysis

    Stanley A Mulaik•Foundations of Factor Analysis•2009

  • Validity of psychological assessment

    Samuel Messick•American Psychologist•1995

  • Issues in the Comparative Measurement of Political Democracy

    K A Bollen•American Sociological Review•1980

Unique citing works3
Citations per year1.5
Citation span2024 - 2026 (3)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 3

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae