A Relative Normed Effect-Size Difference Index for Determining the Number of Common Factors in Exploratory Solutions
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 20284659 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Pere J Ferrando (0000-0002-3133-5466, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Tarragona, Spain), David Navarro-González (0000-0002-9843-5058, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Tarragona, Spain), Urbano Lorenzo‐Seva (0000-0001-5369-3099, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Tarragona, Spain, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 84 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 736-752 |
| Publication date | 2024-08-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Educational and Psychological Measurement (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0013-1644 • E-ISSN: 1552-3888 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/00131644231196482 |
| PMID | 39055099 |
| OpenAlex | W4386512575 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 27 |
Descriptive fit indices that do not require a formal statistical basis and do not specifically depend on a given estimation criterion are useful as auxiliary devices for judging the appropriateness of unrestricted or exploratory factor analytical (UFA) solutions, when the problem is to decide the most appropriate number of common factors. While overall indices of this type are well known in UFA applications, especially those intended for item analysis, difference indices are much more scarce. Recently, Raykov and collaborators proposed a family of effect-size-type descriptive difference indices that are promising for UFA applications. As a starting point, we considered the simplest measure of this family, which (a) can be viewed as absolute and (b) from which only tentative cutoffs and reference values have been provided so far. In this situation, this article has three aims. The first is to propose a relative version of Raykov’s effect-size measure, intended to be used as a complement of the original measure, in which the increase in explained common variance is related to the overall prior estimated amount of common factor variance. The second is to establish reference values for both indices in item-analysis scenarios using simulation. And the third aim (instrumental) is to implement the proposal in both R language and a well-known non-commercial factor analysis program. The functioning and usefulness of the proposal is illustrated using an existing empirical dataset
Complement (music) · Data mining · Econometrics · Exploratory factor analysis · Index (typography) · Measure (data warehouse) · Point (geometry) · Psychometrics · Statistics · Variance (accounting) · Advanced Statistical Modeling Techniques · Computer Science · Mathematics · Mental Health Research Topics · Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Scoring and Modeling Psychological Measures in the Presence of Multidimensionality
Dimensionality assessment of ordered polytomous items with parallel analysis.
Viability of exploratory factor analysis as a precursor to confirmatory factor analysis
On the Multivariate Asymptotic Distribution of Sequential Chi-Square Statistics
A Review and Evaluation of Exploratory Factor Analysis Practices in Organizational Research
Factor analysis in the development and refinement of clinical assessment instruments.
Testing Structural Equation Models
Examining Multidimensional Measuring Instruments for Proximity to Unidimensional Structure Using Latent Variable Modeling
Model Selection and Average Proportion Explained Variance in Exploratory Factor Analysis
Assessing the Quality and Appropriateness of Factor Solutions and Factor Score Estimates in Exploratory Item Factor Analysis
On Effect Size Measures for Nested Measurement Models
Goodness of Fit in Item Response Models
Model Fit and Item Factor Analysis
Incremental Fit Index Changes for Nested Structural Equation Models
Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures
Evaluating replicability of factors in the Revised NEO Personality Inventory
Bootstrapping Goodness-of-Fit Measures in Structural Equation Models
| Citations per year | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2025 - 2025 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |