From a Sampling Precision Perspective, Skewness Is a Friend and Not an Enemy
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 20286982 |
|---|---|
| Authors | David Trafimow (0000-0002-0788-8044, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM, USA, corresponding author), Tonghui Wang (0000-0002-5027-1541, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM, USA), Cong Wang (0000-0002-1498-7104, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM, USA) |
| Year | 2019 |
| Volume | 79 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 129-150 |
| Publication date | 2019-02-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Educational and Psychological Measurement (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0013-1644 • E-ISSN: 1552-3888 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/0013164418764801 |
| PMID | 30636785 |
| OpenAlex | W2796051504 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 13 |
| References cited | 42 |
Two recent publications in Educational and Psychological Measurement advocated that researchers consider using the a priori procedure. According to this procedure, the researcher specifies, prior to data collection, how close she wishes her sample mean(s) to be to the corresponding population mean(s), and the desired probability of being that close. A priori equations provide the necessary sample size to meet specifications under the normal distribution. Or, if sample size is taken as given, a priori equations provide the precision with which estimates of distribution means can be made. However, there is currently no way to perform these calculations under the more general family of skew-normal distributions. The present research provides the necessary equations. In addition, we show how skewness can increase the precision with which locations of distributions can be estimated. This conclusion, based on the perspective of improving sampling precision, contrasts with a typical argument in favor of performing transformations to normalize skewed data for the sake of performing more efficient significance tests
A priori and a posteriori · Argument (complex analysis) · Econometrics · Epistemology · Normal distribution · Perspective (graphical) · Population · Sample (material) · Sample size determination · Sampling (signal processing) · Sampling distribution · Skew · Skewness · Statistics · Advanced Statistical Methods and Models · Artificial Intelligence · Computer Science · Mathematics · Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference · Statistics Education and Methodologies
Making the A Priori Procedure Work for Differences Between Means
The doctrine of normal tendency in active learning teaching methodology
More insightful scientific estimates about population members’ gains
A New Way to Think About Internal and External Validity
The Dark Tetrad, cybervictimization, and cyberbullying
How Much Evidence Is Enough? Biased Thresholds in Judgments of Scientific Conclusions
Ostracism in Real Life
Beliefs about an Offender’s Capacity to Be Rehabilitated
Not All Scientists Are Equal
Effects of Attractiveness and Occupation Type on Attitudes toward Working Women and Men
Gender Differences in the Effects of Support Exchanges on Self-Esteem and Mastery for Mid- to Late-Life Adults
A taxonomy of model assumptions on which P is based and implications for added benefit in the sciences
Why successful replications across contexts and Operationalizations might not be good for theory building or testing
Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences
Theoretical risks and tabular asterisks
Effective Analysis of Reaction Time Data
Skewness and Kurtosis in Real Data Samples
The Case Against Statistical Significance Testing
Appraising and Amending Theories
Bayes Factors
Using the Coefficient of Confidence to Make the Philosophical Switch From A Posteriori to A Priori Inferential Statistics
Descriptive Statistics for Modern Test Score Distributions
Performing Inferential Statistics Prior to Data Collection
Corrupt Research
Theory-Testing in Psychology and Physics
Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test
The test of significance in psychological research
The fallacy of the null-hypothesis significance test
The unicorn, the normal curve, and other improbable creatures
| Citations per year | 1.86 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2019 - 2025 (7) |
| Highly cited | No |