Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Bootstrap Standard Errors for Maximum Likelihood Ability Estimates When Item Parameters Are Unknown

Bibliographic Data

ID20287191
AuthorsJeffrey M Patton (University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN, USA), Ying Cheng (0000-0001-7732-9806, University of Notre Dame), Ke-Hai Yuan (0000-0003-0610-1745, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN, USA), Qi Diao (CTB/McGraw-Hill, Monterey, CA, USA)
Year2014
Volume74
Issue4
Pages697-712
Publication date2014-08-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueEducational and Psychological Measurement (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0013-1644 • E-ISSN: 1552-3888
PublisherSAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/0013164413511083
OpenAlexW2028898374
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited15

When item parameter estimates are used to estimate the ability parameter in item response models, the standard error ( SE) of the ability estimate must be corrected to reflect the error carried over from item calibration. For maximum likelihood (ML) ability estimates, a corrected asymptotic SE is available, but it requires a long test and the covariance matrix of item parameter estimates, which may not be available. An alternative SE can be obtained using the bootstrap. The first purpose of this article is to propose a bootstrap procedure for the SE of ML ability estimates when item parameter estimates are used for scoring. The second purpose is to conduct a simulation to compare the performance of the proposed bootstrap SE with the asymptotic SE under different test lengths and different magnitudes of item calibration error. Both SE estimates closely approximated the empirical SE when the test was long (i.e., 40 items) and when the true ability value was close to the mean of the ability distribution. However, neither SE estimate was uniformly superior: the asymptotic SE tended to underpredict the empirical SE, and the bootstrap SE tended to overpredict the empirical SE. The results suggest that the choice of SE depends on the type and purpose of the test. Additional implications of the results are discussed

Calibration · Covariance matrix · Econometrics · Item response theory · Psychometrics · Standard error · Statistics · Advanced Statistical Modeling Techniques · Mathematics · Psychometric Methodologies and Testing · Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference

  • Robustness of Adaptive Measurement of Change to Item Parameter Estimation Error

    Open Access•Allison Cooperman, David J Weiss et al.•Educational and Psychological…•2022

  • Metric Stability in Item Response Models

    Leah Feuerstahler•Multivariate Behavioral Research•2022

  • An Introduction to the Bootstrap

    Open Access•Bradley Efron, Robert J Tibshirani et al.•An Introduction to the Bootstrap•1993

  • Item Response Theory

    Frank B Baker, Seock-Ho Kim•Item Response Theory•2004

  • An Introduction to the Bootstrap

    Bradley Efron, Robert Tibshirani et al.•Introduction to the Bootstrap•1994

  • Characterizing Sources of Uncertainty in Item Response Theory Scale Scores

    Open Access•Ji Seung Yang, Mark Hansen et al.•Educational and Psychological…•2012

Citations per year0.5
Citation span2022 - 2022 (1)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae