Daniel 7, Intertextuality, and the History of Israel's Cult
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 20292116 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Daniel Boyarin (University of California, Berkeley, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2012 |
| Volume | 105 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 139-162 |
| Publication date | 2012-03-30 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Harvard Theological Review (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0017-8160 • E-ISSN: 1475-4517 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0017816012000478 |
| OpenAlex | W2139033111 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
Professor Hanan Eshel, in memoriam Ancient and modern readers have offered two basic interpretations of the “[One like a] Son of Man” ( ) in Dan 7:13. One line of interpretation holds that the One like a Son of Man is a symbol of a collective, namely, the faithful Israelites at the time of the Maccabean revolt. 1 The other basic line of interpretation sees the One like a Son of Man as a divine figure of one sort or another, a second God, a son of God, or an archangel
Art · Biblical studies · Cult · Interpretation (philosophy) · Intertextuality · Israelites · Linguistics · Literature · Second Temple period · Symbol (formal) · Theology · Archaeology and Historical Studies · Biblical Studies and Interpretation · Historical and Linguistic Studies · History · Philosophy
| Unique citing works | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0.29 |
| Citation span | 2019 - 2022 (4) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 2 |