Response to ‘High Noon for Microfinance Impact Evaluations’
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 20303672 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Matthieu Chemin (McGill University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2012 |
| Volume | 48 |
| Issue | 12 |
| Pages | 1881-1885 |
| Publication date | 2012-12-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The Journal of Development Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0022-0388 • E-ISSN: 1743-9140 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/00220388.2012.727561 |
| OpenAlex | W2003162991 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 3 |
| References cited | 3 |
Duvendack and Palmer-Jones are critical of analysis and conclusions in Chemin (2008) because they are unable to replicate my results. This response identifies key differences between the two papers, especially regarding the sample and measurement of variables, which imply that Duvendack and Paler-Jones should not be considered as either a replication or a criticism of my work
Computer security · Criticism · Economic growth · Economics · Key (lock) · Microfinance · Noon · Political science · Replicate · Replication (statistics) · Sample (material) · Sociology · Statistics · Work (physics) · Computer Science · FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance · Land Rights and Reforms · Law · Mathematics · Microfinance and Financial Inclusion · Psychology
| Unique citing works | 3 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0.21 |
| Citation span | 2012 - 2015 (4) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 3 |