Patterns of directional asymmetry in the pelvis and pelvic canal
Dados Bibliográficos
AUTOR(ES) | |
---|---|
AFILIAÇÃO(ÕES) | University of Victoria Libraries, Division of Biological Anthropology Department of Archaeology and Anthropology University of Cambridge Cambridge UK, Department of Human Evolutionary Biology Harvard University Cambridge Massachusetts 02138 |
ANO | Não informado |
TIPO | Artigo |
DOI | 10.1002/ajhb.22870 |
CITAÇÕES | 3 |
ADICIONADO EM | 2025-08-18 |
Resumo
ObjectivesThe human pelvis is unique among modern taxa for supporting both parturition of large brained young and obligate bipedalism. Though much work has focused on pelvic development and variation, little work has explored the presence or absence of asymmetry in the pelvis despite well‐known patterns of asymmetry in other skeletal regions. This study investigated whether patterns of directional asymmetry (DA) could be observed in the pelvis or pelvic canal.MethodsSeventeen bilaterally paired osteometric measurements of the os coxae (34 measures in total) were taken from 128 skeletons (female n = 65, male n = 63) from recent human populations in five geographic regions. Paired sample t‐tests and Mann–Whitney U‐tests were used to investigate DA.ResultsResults from a pooled sample of all individuals showed that the pelvis exhibited a left‐bias in DA. In contrast, the pelvic canal exhibited a pattern in which the anterior canal exhibited a right‐bias and the posterior canal exhibited a left‐bias. Neither sex nor populational differences in DA were observed in the pelvis or pelvic canal.ConclusionsThe varying patterns of asymmetry uncovered here accord with prior work and may indicate that loading from the trunk and legs place differing stresses on the pelvis and canal, yielding these unequal asymmetries. However, this is speculative and the possible influence of genetics, biomechanics, and nutritional status on the development of pelvic and canal asymmetries presents a rich area for future study. Additionally, the potential influence of pelvic canal asymmetry on obstetric measures of pelvic capacity merits future research. Am. J. Hum. Biol. 28:804–810, 2016. © 2016Wiley Periodicals, Inc.