A cross‐cultural study of sex‐typicality and averageness: Correlation between frontal and lateral measures of human faces
Dados Bibliográficos
AUTOR(ES) | |
---|---|
AFILIAÇÃO(ÕES) | Department of Experimental Psychology Institute of Psychology, University of Sao Paulo Sao Paulo Brazil, Ludwik Hirszfeld Institute of Immunology and Experimental Therapy Polish Academy of Sciences Wroclaw Poland, Department of Philosophy and History of Sciences, Faculty of Sciences Charles University Praha Czech Republic, Human Behaviour Lab, Faculty of Psychology El Bosque University Bogotá Colombia |
ANO | Não informado |
TIPO | Artigo |
DOI | 10.1002/ajhb.23147 |
CITAÇÕES | 1 |
ADICIONADO EM | 2025-08-18 |
Resumo
ObjectivesFacial averageness and sexual dimorphism are extensively studied attractiveness markers, which are viewed as possible indicators of biological quality. Both are complex morphological traits, and both can be easily assessed from frontal and lateral projection of a human face. Interestingly, examination of mutual relations between the frontal and lateral dimensions of these markers has so far received little attention in published research.MethodsIn our cross‐cultural study, we used geometric morphometric data from male and female faces from Brazil, Cameroon, Colombia, and the Czech Republic, and analyzed correlations between frontal and lateral measurements of averageness and degree of maleness/femaleness, that is, the individual variation in features that characterize sexual dimorphism. We also analyzed whether the association between frontal and lateral measurements differed in men and women.ResultsIn general, our results showed a moderate correlation in sexually dimorphic features between lateral and frontal facial configuration in both sexes, while frontal and lateral facial averageness was moderately correlated only in women. This pattern was less consistent when individual populations were analyzed separately.ConclusionsWe suggest that, in general, the weak association between lateral and frontal facial configurations may be the result of selection pressures in favor of individual identity signals. Moreover, especially in women, the frontal and lateral dimension of a given facial attractiveness marker may provide similar information about the qualities of the individual. The absence of a significant correlation in male facial averageness suggests that frontal and lateral averageness convey different information about an individual.