Dados Bibliográficos

AUTOR(ES) P. Navarro , A. Ruderman , Rolando González-José , Virginia Ramallo , Soledad de Azevedo , Celia Cintas , Carolina Paschetta , Claudio Delrieux , Orlando Pérez , Bruno Pazos
AFILIAÇÃO(ÕES) Instituto Patagónico de Ciencias Sociales y Humanas (IPCSH) Centro Nacional Patagónico (CENPAT ‐ CONICET) Puerto Madryn Argentina, IBM Research Africa Nairobi Kenya, Laboratorio de Ciencias de las Imágenes, Departamento de Ingeniería Eléctrica y Computadoras Universidad Nacional del Sur Bahia Blanca Argentina
ANO Não informado
TIPO Artigo
DOI 10.1002/ajhb.23323
CITAÇÕES 1
ADICIONADO EM 2025-08-18

Resumo

ObjectivesThe diagnosis and treatment of obesity are usually based on traditional anthropometric variables including weight, height, and several body perimeters. Here we present a three‐dimensional (3D) image‐based computational approach aimed to capture the distribution of abdominal adipose tissue as an aspect of shape rather than a relationship among classical anthropometric measures.MethodsA morphometric approach based on landmarks and semilandmarks placed upon the 3D torso surface was performed in order to quantify abdominal adiposity shape variation and its relation to classical indices. Specifically, we analyzed sets of body cross‐sectional circumferences, collectively defining each, along with anthropometric data taken on 112 volunteers. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) was performed on 250 circumferences located along the abdominal region of each volunteer. An analysis of covariance model was used to compare shape variables (PCs) against anthropometric data (weight, height, and waist and hip circumferences).ResultsThe observed shape patterns were mainly related to nutritional status, followed by sexual dimorphism. PC1 (12.5%) and PC2 (7.5%) represented 20% of the total variation. In PCAs calculated independently by sex, linear regression analyses provide statistically significant associations between PC1 and the three classical indexes: body mass index, waist‐to‐height ratio, and waist‐hip ratio.ConclusionShape indicators predict well the behavior of classical markers, but also evaluate 3D and geometric features with more accuracy as related to the body shape under study. This approach also facilitates diagnosis and follow‐up of therapies by using accessible 3D technology.

Ferramentas