In Defense of North Korea Sanctions
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 20308628 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Robert E Kelly (0009-0001-3130-4969, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2022 |
| Volume | 53 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 247-276 |
| Publication date | 2022-06-30 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Korea Observer - Institute of Korean Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0023-3919 • E-ISSN: 2586-3053 |
| Publisher | Korea Observer - Institute of Korean Studies (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.29152/koiks.2022.53.2.247 |
| OpenAlex | W4284888103 |
| Language | EN |
South Korean President Moon Jae-In's administration has sought sanctions relief for North Korea, but South Korea's allies have rejected those solicitations. This paper formalizes the allies' anti-relief impulses. It argues both against sanctions critiques and on behalf of sanctions. First, it disputes common sanction critiques, arguing that: 1) the humanitarian crisis in North Korea is the fault of the regime's choices, not sanctions; 2) sanctions have in fact been somewhat effective; and 3) North Korean leader Kim Jong Un is not a reformer. Second, this paper defends sanctions, because they: 1) express the international community's moral rejection of North Korean totalitarianism; 2) constrict North Korean economic growth in the strategic interest of South Korea and its partner democracies; 3) deter other states from following North Korea's nuclear and missile path; 4) give teeth to United Nations Security Council resolutions; and 5) punish North Korea for international law (UNSCR) violations
Economic sanctions · Economics · Geography · International community · International law · International trade · Missile · Nuclear weapon · Political science · Politics · Sanctions · Security council · Asian Geopolitics and Ethnography · Economic Sanctions and International Relations · Korean Peninsula Historical and Political Studies · Law
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |