Omnipresence and Incorporeality
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 20310686 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Grace M Dyck (Trinity Western University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1977 |
| Volume | 13 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 85-91 |
| Publication date | 1977-03-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Religious Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0034-4125 • E-ISSN: 1469-901X |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0034412500009732 |
| OpenAlex | W2147023895 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
Predominant branches of historic Christianity have traditionally held to each of two doctrines about God: that he is incorporeal and that he is omnipresent. And in the minds of many people, these two doctrines do not simply represent two independent characteristics or attributes of God, but rather they are closely related. A.H.Strong, a conservative theologian active during the early years of this century, writes, ‘God’s omnipresence is not the presence of a part but of the whole of God in every place. This follows from the conception of God as incorporeal.’ 1 More recently, Dr Harold Kuhn put forward a view which similarly links the two notions. 2 When we recite the Apostles’ Creed and affirm our belief in ‘God the Father Almighty’ we are, according to Kuhn, also implying our belief in an incorporeal God, for any imputation of a body to him would appear to entail spatial limitation, since it is thought that only a bodiless being could be omnipresent
Apostles · Creed · Epistemology · Omnipresence · Theology · Karl Barth and Christian Theology · Philosophy · Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices · Theology and Philosophy of Evil
| Citations per year | 0.5 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2022 - 2023 (2) |
| Highly cited | No |