Irony and Argument in Dialogues , XII
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 20310866 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Scott Davis (0000-0002-2806-5821, University of Southern California, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1991 |
| Volume | 27 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 239-257 |
| Publication date | 1991-06-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Religious Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0034-4125 • E-ISSN: 1469-901X |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0034412500020874 |
| OpenAlex | W2085696806 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 12 |
Toward the end of Hume's Dialogues concerning Natural Religion , Philo catalogues the ‘frivolous observances’, ‘rapturous ecstasies’ and ‘bigotted credulity’ of ‘vulgar superstition’, concluding that ‘true religion, I allow, has no such pernicious consequences: But we must treat of religion, as it has com monly been found in the world’ (Hume, 1947: 222–3). This would be a mild enough sort of caveat were it not nigh on impossible to determine exactly what counts as true religion, and how it figures in Hume's argument. Typically, answers to this puzzle have required identifying the positions of the discussants, and then arguing that one of them represents Hume's views. A catalogue of the options may prove instructive
Argument (complex analysis) · Epistemology · Irony · Linguistics · Superstition · Theology · Biblical Studies and Interpretation · Chemistry · Evolution and Science Education · Philosophy · Religion, Ecology, and Ethics
| Unique citing works | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0.05 |
| Citation span | 2007 - 2007 (1) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |