Aquinas, the a priori/a posteriori distinction, and the Kantian dependency thesis
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 20310873 |
|---|---|
| Authors | JACOB ARCHAMBAULT (Fordham University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2014 |
| Volume | 50 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 175-192 |
| Publication date | 2014-06-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Religious Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0034-4125 • E-ISSN: 1469-901X |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0034412513000292 |
| OpenAlex | W2123717362 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 7 |
This article re-examines the applicability of Kant's dependency thesis to Aquinas’ cosmological proofs for the existence of God. The first part of the article provides a summary of Kant's dependency thesis, followed by a review of a defence of Aquinas by J. William Forgie. The second part of the article explains some of the logical apparatus upon which Aquinas’ argument hinges – specifically his understanding of the a priori/a posteriori distinction. I conclude by calling attention to certain distinct metaphysical assumptions within Kant's and Aquinas’ respective logical apparatus that would have to be addressed prior to the more specific question of whether Kant's critique of the cosmological argument is applicable to Aquinas
A priori and a posteriori · Argument (complex analysis) · Dependency (UML) · Epistemology · Existence of God · Mathematical proof · Metaphysics · Ontological argument · Philosophy of religion · Theism · Computer Science · Mathematics · Medieval and Classical Philosophy · Medieval Philosophy and Theology · Philosophy · Theology and Philosophy of Evil
| Highly cited | No |
|---|