Response to Helm, Quinn, and Westphal
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 20311153 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Nicholas Wolterstorff (Yale University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2001 |
| Volume | 37 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 293-306 |
| Publication date | 2001-09-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Religious Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0034-4125 • E-ISSN: 1469-901X |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0034412501005674 |
| OpenAlex | W1986308725 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
Before beginning my response, let me express the honour I feel in having these three friends and distinguished philosophical colleagues comment so thoughtfully on my ideas in Divine Discourse . I warmly thank them for their ‘labours’. I propose mirroring the general structure of the book itself in my response. First, I'll consider what Helm says about my delineation of the topic, second, what Quinn says about my discussion of God speaking; third, what Westphal says about my discussion of interpreting for God's speech; and last, what Quinn says about my discussion of the epistemology of believing that God speaks
Epistemology · Honour · Mirroring · Theology · Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics · Karl Barth and Christian Theology · Law · Philosophy · Psychology · Social Psychology · Theology and Philosophy of Evil
| Citations per year | 0.4 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2021 - 2025 (5) |
| Highly cited | No |