Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The myth of religious experience

Bibliographic Data

ID20311199
AuthorsNick Zangwill (0000-0002-9117-9637, University of Oxford, corresponding author)
Year2004
Volume40
Issue1
Pages1-22
Publication date2004-03-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueReligious Studies (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0034-4125 • E-ISSN: 1469-901X
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/s0034412503006772
OpenAlexW2072032310
LanguageEN
Citations received11
References cited4

I argue that people do not and cannot have religious experiences that are perceptual experiences with theological content and that provide some justification for the belief in God. I discuss William Alston's resourceful defence of this idea. My strategy is to say that religious perception would either have to be by means of one of the ordinary five senses or else by means of some special sixth religious sense. In either case insoluble epistemological problems arise. The problem is with perceiving God as God, which we need to do if reasons to believe in God are to be generated. To do so, we would have to perceive the instantiation of His essential properties – being all-knowing, all-powerful, and all-good. But perceiving the instantiation of these properties of God, even by some special sixth religious sense, is impossible. Hence, God cannot be perceived either by the ordinary five senses or by a sixth religious sense. Religious perceptual experiences are a myth

Content (measure theory) · Epistemology · Existence of God · Mythology · Perception · Religious belief · Religious experience · Theism · Theology · Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics · Karl Barth and Christian Theology · Mathematics · Philosophy · Psychology · Theology and Philosophy of Evil

  • Por uma Filosofia (da Religião) Criativa

    Open Access•Agnaldo Cuoco Portugal, Clarissa Pimentel Portugal•Trans/Form/Ação•2023

  • A problem with Alston's indirect analogy-argument from religious experience

    Open Access•Ulf Zackariasson•Religious Studies•2006

  • Perceptual reports and the impossibility of perceiving god

    Open Access•Timothy Perrine•The Philosophical Quarterly•2025

  • Journeys of sacredness

    Chunxiao Li, Yasra Sayyed et al.•Journal of Sustainable Tourism•2026

  • Religious experience and desire

    Open Access•Fiona Ellis•Religious Studies•2019

  • Spiritual desire and religious practice

    Open Access•Clare Carlisle•Religious Studies•2019

  • The Demystification of Nick Zangwill’s “Myth of Religious Experience”

    Open Access•Manuel Fasko•Open Theology•2017

  • Religious Experience, Adumbrated

    Open Access•Olga Louchakova-Schwartz, Courtenay Crouch•Open Theology•2017

  • The Myth of Religious Experience Revisited

    Open Access•Nick Zangwill•Open Theology•2017

  • Being and Time-less Faith

    Open Access•Jonathan David Lyonhart, Jonathan Lyonhart•Open Theology•2020

  • From Brain Imaging Religious Experience to Explaining Religion

    Open Access•Nina P Azari, Marc Slors•Archive for the Psychology of…•2007

  • The Principle of Credulity and Religious Experience

    Open Access•Michael E Martins, Michael Martins et al.•Religious Studies•1986

  • Why Alston's Mystical Doxastic Practice Is Subjective

    Richard M Gale, William Alston•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•1994

  • Reply to Commentators

    John Mcdowell•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•1998

  • An Argument for the Identity Theory

    David K Lewis, Inc Journal of Philosophy•The Journal of Philosophy•1966

Unique citing works11
Citations per year0,55
Citation span2006 - 2026 (21)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 9

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae