A response to Cordry on design
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 20311385 |
|---|---|
| Authors | MARK WYNN (0000-0003-1529-8498, University of Exeter, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2006 |
| Volume | 42 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 291-297 |
| Publication date | 2006-09-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Religious Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0034-4125 • E-ISSN: 1469-901X |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0034412506008456 |
| OpenAlex | W2114306912 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 1 |
In his paper ‘Theism and the philosophy of nature’, Ben Cordry argues that theism's conception of nature has been falsified. In this response, I argue that the universe in many ways conforms to theistic expectations, and that there is no presumption that a divinely ordered world will take the form that Cordry proposes
Epistemology · Political science · Presumption · Theism · Karl Barth and Christian Theology · Law · Philosophy · Religion, Ecology, and Ethics · Theology and Philosophy of Evil
| Highly cited | No |
|---|