God, compatibilism, and the authorship of sin
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 20312062 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Paul Helm (0000-0002-2719-9721, Regent College, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2010 |
| Volume | 46 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 115-124 |
| Publication date | 2010-03-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Religious Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0034-4125 • E-ISSN: 1469-901X |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0034412509990345 |
| OpenAlex | W1994141077 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 1 |
Peter Byrne has presented arguments against the effectiveness of two ‘defensive strategies’ deployed in my books Eternal God and The Providence of God respectively. These strategies were originally presented to support the cogency of ‘theological compatibilism’ by arguing against the claims that it is inconsistent with human responsibility, and that it entails that God is the author of sin. In this present article the author offers a number of clarifications to his original thesis and argues that Byrne's arguments do not succeed in their aim of undermining the two strategies
Compatibilism · Epistemology · Free will · Medieval Philosophy and Theology · Philosophy · Theology and Philosophy of Evil · War, Ethics, and Justification
| Citations per year | 0.14 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2019 - 2019 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |