The Buddha Nature

True Self as Action

Bibliographic Data

ID20312203
AuthorsSallie B King (0000-0001-6246-3367, corresponding author)
Year1984
Volume20
Issue2
Pages255-267
Publication date1984-06-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueReligious Studies (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0034-4125 • E-ISSN: 1469-901X
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/s0034412500016036
OpenAlexW1981775847
LanguageEN
Citations received4
References cited5

Buddhism, and especially early Buddhism, is known for the anātman (no self) teaching. By any account, this teaching is central to both doctrine and practice from the beginning. Zen Buddhism (Chinese Ch'an), in contrast, is known for its teaching that the single most important thing in life is to discover the ‘true self’. Is there a real, or only an apparent, conflict between these two versions of Buddhism? Certainly there is at the least a radical change in the linguistic formulation of the teaching. Examining the two teachings on the linguistic level, we note that the use of the term ‘true’ in the phrase ‘true self’ may indicate that we have here a conscious reformation of the place of the term ‘self’ in the tradition, or perhaps that the use of this phrase in Zen is the product of such a conscious formulation. Thus we may expect, upon investigation, to find an evolution from one teaching to the other, rather than a true doctrinal disparity. The apparent, or linguistic, conflict between the two, however, remains; hence we must also expect to find a doctrinal formulation at some point in this evolution in which the apparent conflict is consciously apprehended and resolved

Action (physics) · Buddhism · Doctrine · Epistemology · Gautama Buddha · Linguistics · Literature · Phrase · Product (mathematics) · Term (time) · Theology · Chinese history and philosophy · Indian and Buddhist Studies · Mathematics · Philosophy

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub