Eternity has no Duration

In 1981 Eleonore Stump and Norman Kretzmann published a landmark article aimed at exploring the classical concept of divine eternity. 1 Taking Boethius as the primary spokesman for the traditional view, they analyse God's eternity as timeless yet as possessing duration. More recently Brian Leftow has seconded Stump and Kretzmann's interpretation of the medieval position (with qualifications) and attempted to defend the notion of a durational eternity as a useful way of expressing the sort of life God leads. 2 However, there are good reasons to reject the idea that divine timelessness should be thought of as having duration. The medievals probably did not accept it, as it contradicts a principle of classical metaphysics even more fundamental than the atemporality of the divine. In any case, it is not possible to express the notion of durational eternity in even a minimally coherent way, and the attempt to salvage the concept by appealing to the Thomistic doctrine of analogy is unsuccessful. The best analogy for God's eternity is still the one proposed by Augustine at the end of the fourth century. God lives in a timeless ‘present’, unextended like our temporal present, but immutable and encompassing all time

Analogy · Art · Doctrine · Duration (music) · Epistemology · Eternity · Interpretation (philosophy) · Linguistics · Literature · Metaphysics · Philosophy of religion · Theology · Augustinian Studies and Theology · Medieval Philosophy and Theology · Philosophy · Theology and Philosophy of Evil

• Augustine on the Existence of the Past and the Future

  David Anzalone•Archiv für Geschichte der…•2022

  Add to list

• The Traditional Doctrine of Divine Simplicity

  Open Access•Katherin A Rogers, KATHERIN ROGERS•Religious Studies•1996

  Add to list