It is logically impossible for everlasting God to fall into boredom
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 20312570 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Jerome Gellman (0000-0002-7507-9409, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2018 |
| Volume | 54 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 285-288 |
| Publication date | 2018-06-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Religious Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0034-4125 • E-ISSN: 1469-901X |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0034412517000300 |
| OpenAlex | W2750882598 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 1 |
This article argues that everlasting God can be in boredom, but cannot fall into boredom. Hence, the argument by Andric and Tanyi (2017) in this journal that God could not be everlasting in time, because God would fall into boredom, is shown to be unsound, since it is logically impossible for God to fall into boredom
Argument (complex analysis) · Art · Boredom · Epistemology · Fall of man · Literature · Political science · Politics · Augustinian Studies and Theology · Chemistry · Law · Philosophy · Theological Perspectives and Practices · Theology and Philosophy of Evil
| Highly cited | No |
|---|