Reconciling reason and religion
A response to Peels
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 20312700 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Brian Zamulinski (0000-0003-4605-7697, Kainan University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2010 |
| Volume | 46 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 109-113 |
| Publication date | 2010-03-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Religious Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0034-4125 • E-ISSN: 1469-901X |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0034412509990205 |
| OpenAlex | W1966233070 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 3 |
In ‘The ethics of belief and Christian faith as commitment to assumptions’, Rik Peels attacks the views that I advanced in ‘Christianity and the ethics of belief’. Here, I rebut his criticisms of the claim that it is wrong to believe without sufficient evidence, of the contention that Christians are committed to that claim, and of the notion of that faith is not belief but commitment to assumptions in the hope of salvation. My original conclusions still stand
Christianity · Epistemology · Faith · Religious belief · Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics · Philosophy · Religious studies · Theology and Philosophy of Evil · War, Ethics, and Justification
| Highly cited | No |
|---|