The Onus of Proof in Arguments About the Problem of Evil
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 20312985 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Frank Fitzpatrick (St Patrick's College, corresponding author), F J Fitzpatrick |
| Year | 1981 |
| Volume | 17 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 19-38 |
| Publication date | 1981-03-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Religious Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0034-4125 • E-ISSN: 1469-901X |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0034412500012762 |
| OpenAlex | W2095992633 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 6 |
| References cited | 4 |
Faced with the problem of evil, theistic philosophers, in their endeavour to show that religious belief is coherent and tenable, usually produce an argument running along the following lines: The presence of evil in the world is justified by the fact that some evils are positively required for the achievement of a certain good (or, perhaps, certain goods) which God wants to achieve; and this good is of such great value as to make the evils which we encounter well worth enduring. Since, then (so the argument goes), the evils of this world are necessary conditions for the attainment of much greater good, God is justifed in permitting their occurrence
Argument (complex analysis) · Economics · Epistemology · Good and evil · Law and economics · Problem of Evil · Theism · Value (mathematics) · Mathematics · Medieval Philosophy and Theology · Philosophy · Theology and Philosophy of Evil · War, Ethics, and Justification
| Citations per year | 0.17 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 1990 - 2026 (37) |
| Highly cited | No |