Discussion – Infallibility
In Defence of Infallibility
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 20313028 |
|---|---|
| Authors | A P Martinich (The University of Texas at Austin, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1982 |
| Volume | 18 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 81-86 |
| Publication date | 1982-03-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Religious Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0034-4125 • E-ISSN: 1469-901X |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0034412500013512 |
| OpenAlex | W2945077155 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 4 |
Patrick McGrath has argued that my defence of papal infallibility does not succeed. His basic strategy is to establish that, contrary to my arguments, infallible papal utterances are statements and not merely declarations. He wants this result in order to go on to show that the Pope, in possession of no priviliged epistemic access to the world, is not infallible. I agree that the Pope has no priviliged epistemic access; so that is not in dispute. What is in dispute is the fundamental question of whether infallible papal utterances are statements or declarations. I want to show that McGrath's arguments against my position do not work. If I am successful, then the Pope's infallibility is secure
Epistemology · Infallibility · Linguistics · Order (exchange) · Possession (linguistics) · Forgiveness and Related Behaviors · Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies · Philosophy · Theology and Canon Law Studies
| Highly cited | No |
|---|