Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Thomas Henshaw and Sir Robert Paston's pursuit of the red elixir

An early collaboration between fellows of The Royal Society

Bibliographic Data

ID20315463
AuthorsDonald R Dickson (0000-0001-7980-0307, Texas A & M University, College Station, Texas, USA, corresponding author)
Year1997
Volume51
Issue1
Pages57-76
Publication date1997-01-22
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueNotes and Records the Royal Society Journal of the History of Science (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0035-9149 • E-ISSN: 1743-0178
PublisherThe Royal Society (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1098/rsnr.1997.0006
OpenAlexW1985110263
LanguageEN
Citations received1

The problems involved in using Baconian categories to understand the great instauration Bacon hoped to foster are now well known. Natural philosophers were, for Bacon, empiricists, who tested their observations of nature openly, and their foes were superstitious dogmatists, who speculated by conjuring hypotheses in secret. As Joseph Agassi has wryly remarked, ‘once a person, historian or not, accepts a division of mankind into open-minded and closed-minded, he almost invariably finds himself on the right side’.1We now appreciate how broad even the Royal Society's conception of natural philosophy was, given the hermetic interests of many of its early members.2 By examining an early collaborative effort of Thomas Henshaw and Sir Robert Paston, who were both respected Fellows of the Royal Society as well as ‘chemical alchemists’ or ‘chemical philosophers’ following a rigorous, quantitative programme of experimentation, this essay will confirm that the actual practice of natural philosophy was broad indeed, and hardly revolutionary.3 Our view of these shadowy figures is usually obscured by the backdrop against which they are set, a backdrop that was created as the category of ‘natural magic’ disappeared, with part becoming science and the rest being discarded as superstition. The evidence to be examined includes an alchemical treatise in the British Library (Sloane 2222) and Henshaw's correspondence discussing it. Although the status of alchemy certainly changed during the course of the seventeenth century, it did so because more rigorous experimentation proved the alchemist's claims to be unverifiable, not because any underlying theories had been altered. The letters, especially, illustrate this process and also shed light on the differences between the closed world of alchemy and the more open culture of science then emerging

Alchemy · Astrology · Empiricism · Epistemology · MAGIC (telescope) · Natural (archaeology) · Natural Philosophy · Political science · Sociology · Superstition · Theology · Classics · Diverse Historical and Scientific Studies · History · History of Science and Medicine · History of Science and Natural History · Law · Philosophy

  • Thomas Vaughan and the Iatrochemical Revolution

    Donald R Dickson•The Seventeenth Century•2000

Citations per year0.04
Citation span2000 - 2000 (1)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae