Censoring Huxley and Wilberforce

In mid July 1860, the Athenaeum published a summary of the discussions about Charles Darwin's theory that took place at the British Association meeting in Oxford. Its account omitted the famous exchange between Samuel Wilberforce, Bishop of Oxford, and Thomas Huxley, the rising man of science. A fuller report of the meeting was published a week later in a local weekly, the Oxford Chronicle, but this has gone unnoticed by historians. The Oxford Chronicle supplies a new version of Wilberforce's question to Huxley, with more material about religious objections to human evolution and the proper role of authority in popular scientific discussions. Excerpts from the Athenaeum and Oxford Chronicle accounts show that they likely had a common ancestor, and other sources corroborate details given only in the Oxford Chronicle. This discovery reveals that the Athenaeum narrative—until now the longest and best known—was censored to remove material that was considered objectionable. The Oxford Chronicle gives us a fuller story of what was said and how the audience reacted to the encounter between Huxley and Wilberforce

Art · Censoring (clinical trials) · Charles darwin · Epistemology · Literature · Narrative · Classics · Evolution and Science Education · History · Medicine · Philosophy

• That Huxley Defeated Wilberforce, and Ridiculed His Obscurantism, in the 1860 Oxford Debate

  Open Access•John Hedley Brooke•Darwin Mythology•2024

  Add to list