‘Vividness’ in english natural history and anatomy, 1650–1700

This article concerns the use of rhetorical strategies in the natural historical and anatomical works of the seventeenth-century Royal Society. Choosing representative works, it argues that naturalists such as Nehemiah Grew, John Ray and the neuroanatomist Thomas Willis used the rhetorical device known as ‘comparison’ to make their descriptions of natural things vivid. By turning to contemporary works of neurology such as Willis's Cerebri Anatome and contemporary rhetorical works inspired by other such descriptions of the brain and nerves, it is argued that the effects of these strategies were taken to be wide-ranging. Contemporaries understood the effects of rhetoric in terms inflected by anatomical and medical discourse—the brain was physically altered by powerful sense impressions such as those of rhetoric. I suggest that the rhetoric of natural history could have been understood in the same way and that natural history and anatomy might therefore have been understood to cultivate the mind, improving its capacity for moral judgements as well as giving it knowledge of nature

Aesthetics · Art · Epistemology · Linguistics · Literature · Natural (archaeology) · Natural history · Rhetoric · Rhetorical question · Sociology · Historical Philosophy and Science · History · History of Medicine Studies · Medicine · Philosophy

• Robert Boyle and the representation of imperceptible entities

  Open Access•Alexander Wragge-Morley•The British Journal for the…•2018

  Add to list