Personal Continuity and Instrumental Rationality in Rawls’ Theory of Justice
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 20317122 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Adrian M S Piper, Adrian Piper (corresponding author) |
| Year | 1987 |
| Volume | 13 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 49-76 |
| Publication date | 1987-01-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Social Theory and Practice (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0037-802X • E-ISSN: 2154-123X |
| Publisher | Philosophy Documentation Center (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.5840/soctheorpract19871317 |
| OpenAlex | W2024414541 |
| Language | EN |
I want to examine the implications of a metaphysical thesis which is presupposed in various objections to Rawls' theory of justice. 1 Although their criticisms differ in many respects, they concur in employing what I shall refer to as the continuity thesis. This consists of the following claims conjointly
Applied philosophy · Criminology · Economic Justice · Epistemology · Law and economics · Political science · Rationality · Sociology · Critical Theory and Philosophy · Law · Philosophy · Political Economy and Marxism · Political Philosophy and Ethics · Psychology · Social Psychology
| Highly cited | No |
|---|