Why Consequentialism’s "Compelling Idea" Is Not
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 20317431 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Paul Hurley (0000-0002-8964-5774, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2017 |
| Volume | 43 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 29-54 |
| Publication date | 2017-01-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Social Theory and Practice (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0037-802X • E-ISSN: 2154-123X |
| Publisher | Philosophy Documentation Center (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.5840/soctheorpract20174312 |
| OpenAlex | W2551123680 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 15 |
Applied philosophy · Consequentialism · Contemporary philosophy · Environmental ethics · Epistemology · Law and economics · Sociology · Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics · Philosophy · Political Philosophy and Ethics · War, Ethics, and Justification
The Rejection of Consequentializing
Opting for the Best
Rationalist Teleological Maximalism
Rationalist Maximalism
Which, if Either, Are We to Assess Directly in Terms of What Ultimately Matters
What’s the Relevant Sort of Control?
Glossary
Maximalism and the Ought-Most-Reason View
Which Options Have Their Deontic Statuses in Virtue of Their Own Goodness?
What Are Our Options?
Against Consequentialist Interpretations of Deontological Principles
Consequentializing ends
Consequentialists Must Kill
How to Be a Self-Effacing Consequentializing Quasi-Realist
Exploitation and effective altruism
| Citations per year | 2.14 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2019 - 2026 (8) |
| Highly cited | No |