An Institutionalist Reframing of the Religion and Public Reason Debate
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 20317738 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Jonathan Chaplin (0000-0001-8128-4225, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2021 |
| Volume | 47 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 589-602 |
| Publication date | 2021-01-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Social Theory and Practice (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0037-802X • E-ISSN: 2154-123X |
| Publisher | Philosophy Documentation Center (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.5840/soctheorpract2021614134 |
| OpenAlex | W3175164569 |
| Language | EN |
Responding to the preceding four articles, this piece presents a theologically-informed ‘institutionalist’ perspective on the debate within political liberalism over religion and public reason. Institutionalism calls for greater attention to the normative purpose and structural design of political institutions in order better to frame what political deliberation in a liberal democracy should look like. Eschewing any ‘idealization’ of citizens, and favouring an ‘argumentative’ account of democratic deliberation, it explores what public reasoning should consist in when viewed as an empirical practice occurring within actual political institutions. Five features of my account of institutionalism are outlined, followed by three implications of that account for the religion and public reason debate
Cognitive reframing · Deliberation · Deliberative democracy · Democracy · Economics · Epistemology · Idealization · Institutionalism · Legitimacy · Liberalism · Neutrality · New institutionalism · Normative · Political science · Politics · Positive economics · Public reason · Sociology · American Constitutional Law and Politics · Law · Philosophy · Religion and Society Interactions · Religious Education and Schools · Social Psychology
| Highly cited | No |
|---|