Deliberative Institutions and Conversational Participation in Liberal Democracies
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 20317799 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Jeremy Neill (corresponding author) |
| Year | 2013 |
| Volume | 39 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 449-476 |
| Publication date | 2013-01-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Social Theory and Practice (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0037-802X • E-ISSN: 2154-123X |
| Publisher | Philosophy Documentation Center (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.5840/soctheorpract201339325 |
| OpenAlex | W2002924175 |
| Language | EN |
Deliberative democracy is an account of legitimacy and participation whose purposes are to produce justifiable political outcomes and to involve the citizens in pro ductive conversations with each other. This article argues for a greater reliance on the efforts of local conversational participants in the institutional construction process. Be cause of their epistemic advantages, local participants are usually the agents who are most optimally positioned to construct the deliberative institutions. As such, institutional ized deliberation ought not to be seen as an orderly event that is capable of being planned out beforehand by philosophers, but rather as a complex process that flourishes when the conversation is developing—as much as is practicable—on its own
Applied philosophy · Deliberative democracy · Democracy · Epistemology · Liberal democracy · Political science · Politics · Social science · Sociology · Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics · Foucault, Power, and Ethics · Law · Philosophy · Political Philosophy and Ethics
| Highly cited | No |
|---|