Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Why do we wear masks? Legitimacy, trust and norm compliance during pandemic

Bibliographic Data

ID20318099
AuthorsDanilo Vuković (0000-0001-5209-1344, University of Belgrade – Faculty of Law, corresponding author)
Year2021
Volume63
Issue4
Pages649-668
Publication date2021-01-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueSociologija (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0038-0318 • E-ISSN: 2406-0712
PublisherNational Library of Serbia (PUBLISHER • RS)
DOI10.2298/soc2104649v
OpenAlexW4206489600
LanguageEN
References cited25

Health regulations curbing the spread of the Kovid-19 virus have brought a number of restrictions into our social life, from wearing masks and maintaining physical distance, to the complete abolition of important segments of social life. In doing so, the government has responded to the key risks of a pandemic: the health of individuals and the ability of health systems to care for large numbers of patients. At the very beginning of the pandemic, two notions took shape in the public: that young people are at lower risk than the elderly and the sick, and that they adhere less to epidemiological measures. Using a dana obtained through the survey at a sample of students at the Faculty of Law in Belgrade, I tried to establish the extent to which they comply with the regulations and which factors influence it the most. The results show that a relatively small percentage of respondents regularly comply with health regulations and that most of them are in the ambivalence zone. Compliance with the measures is influenced by the following factors: belief that the measures are justified and effective, that is, agreement with the content of the norms; trust in institutions, and especially trust in experts and doctors; as well as regular media consumption and trust in their objectivity. Social control, that is, moral and legal condemnation for non-compliance with measures, did not prove to be significant. These findings show that in crisis such as this, clear and transparent communication, and the behavior of actors and institutions that instills trust, can ensure voluntary compliance with legal measures

Ambivalence · Business · Compliance (psychology) · Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) · Government (linguistics) · Legitimacy · Norm (philosophy) · Objectivity (philosophy) · Pandemic · Political science · Politics · Public relations · Social distance · Law · Law in Society and Culture · Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues · Medicine · Patient Dignity and Privacy · Psychology · Social Psychology

  • Conclusions

    Pippa Norris•Critical citizens•1999

  • How Europeans View and Evaluate Democracy

    Monica Ferrín, Hanspeter Kriesi•How Europeans View and Evaluate…•2016

  • The Role of Experts in the Covid-19 Pandemic and the Limits of Their Epistemic Authority in Democracy

    Open Access•Andrea Lavazza, Mirko Farina•Frontiers in Public Health•2020

  • Covid-19 in everyday life

    Open Access•Dusan Ristic, Ana Pajvančić-Cizelj et al.•Sociologija•2020

  • Covid-19, mobility and self-isolation. Experiences of the Serbia’s citizens in the times of global pandemic

    Open Access•Jelena Pešić•Sociologija•2020

  • Science, society, and policy in the face of uncertainty

    Open Access•Graham P Martins, Graham P Martin et al.•Critical Public Health•2020

  • Is There a Crisis of Democracy

    Open Access•Wolfgang Merkel•Democratic Theory•2014

  • Norms, Normativity, and the Legitimacy of Justice Institutions

    Open Access•Jonathan Jackson•Annual Review of Law and Social…•2018

  • Mobilizing Policy (In)Capacity to Fight Covid-19

    Open Access•Giliberto Capano, Michael Howlett et al.•Policy and Society•2020

  • The Individual Bases of Political Trust

    Gabriela Catterberg•International Journal of Public…•2005

  • The March Towards Post‐Democracy, Ten Years On

    Open Access•C Crouch•The Political Quarterly•2015

  • Trust, Distrust and Skepticism

    William Mishler, Richard Rose•The Journal of Politics•1997

  • Investigating the Roots of Civic Morality

    Open Access•Natalia Letki•Political Behavior•2006

  • Democracy and the Politics of Coronavirus

    Open Access•Matthew Flinders•Parliamentary Affairs•2021

  • In Search of Legitimacy

    Open Access•Craig A Mcewen, Richard J Maiman•Law & Policy•1986

  • Psychological Perspectives on Legitimacy and Legitimation

    T R Tyler•Annual Review of Psychology•2005

  • Hot Crises and Media Reassurance

    Sheldon Ungar•British Journal of Sociology•1998

  • Responding to global infectious disease outbreaks

    Open Access•R Smith, Richard D Smith•Social Science & Medicine•2006

  • Good Governance and Norms of Citizenship

    Open Access•Peter Kotzian•American Journal of Economics and…•2014

  • On the Road to Normal

    Open Access•Jessica R Greenberg, Jessica Greenberg•American Anthropologist•2011

  • West Nile virus

    Open Access•Maya Gislason, Maya K Gislason•Sociology of Health & Illness•2013

  • Attention to the media and worry over becoming infected

    Open Access•Gustavo S Mesch, Kent P Schwirian et al.•Sociology of Health & Illness•2013

  • The return of the city-state

    Open Access•Lily M Hoffman•Sociology of Health & Illness•2013

  • Risk society online

    Open Access•Andrea Laurent‐simpson, Celia C Lo•Sociology of Health & Illness•2019

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae