Why do we wear masks? Legitimacy, trust and norm compliance during pandemic
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 20318099 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Danilo Vuković (0000-0001-5209-1344, University of Belgrade – Faculty of Law, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2021 |
| Volume | 63 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 649-668 |
| Publication date | 2021-01-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Sociologija (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0038-0318 • E-ISSN: 2406-0712 |
| Publisher | National Library of Serbia (PUBLISHER • RS) |
| DOI | 10.2298/soc2104649v |
| OpenAlex | W4206489600 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 25 |
Health regulations curbing the spread of the Kovid-19 virus have brought a number of restrictions into our social life, from wearing masks and maintaining physical distance, to the complete abolition of important segments of social life. In doing so, the government has responded to the key risks of a pandemic: the health of individuals and the ability of health systems to care for large numbers of patients. At the very beginning of the pandemic, two notions took shape in the public: that young people are at lower risk than the elderly and the sick, and that they adhere less to epidemiological measures. Using a dana obtained through the survey at a sample of students at the Faculty of Law in Belgrade, I tried to establish the extent to which they comply with the regulations and which factors influence it the most. The results show that a relatively small percentage of respondents regularly comply with health regulations and that most of them are in the ambivalence zone. Compliance with the measures is influenced by the following factors: belief that the measures are justified and effective, that is, agreement with the content of the norms; trust in institutions, and especially trust in experts and doctors; as well as regular media consumption and trust in their objectivity. Social control, that is, moral and legal condemnation for non-compliance with measures, did not prove to be significant. These findings show that in crisis such as this, clear and transparent communication, and the behavior of actors and institutions that instills trust, can ensure voluntary compliance with legal measures
Ambivalence · Business · Compliance (psychology) · Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) · Government (linguistics) · Legitimacy · Norm (philosophy) · Objectivity (philosophy) · Pandemic · Political science · Politics · Public relations · Social distance · Law · Law in Society and Culture · Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues · Medicine · Patient Dignity and Privacy · Psychology · Social Psychology
Conclusions
How Europeans View and Evaluate Democracy
The Role of Experts in the Covid-19 Pandemic and the Limits of Their Epistemic Authority in Democracy
Covid-19 in everyday life
Covid-19, mobility and self-isolation. Experiences of the Serbia’s citizens in the times of global pandemic
Science, society, and policy in the face of uncertainty
Is There a Crisis of Democracy
Norms, Normativity, and the Legitimacy of Justice Institutions
Mobilizing Policy (In)Capacity to Fight Covid-19
The Individual Bases of Political Trust
The March Towards Post‐Democracy, Ten Years On
Trust, Distrust and Skepticism
Investigating the Roots of Civic Morality
Democracy and the Politics of Coronavirus
In Search of Legitimacy
Psychological Perspectives on Legitimacy and Legitimation
Hot Crises and Media Reassurance
Responding to global infectious disease outbreaks
Good Governance and Norms of Citizenship
On the Road to Normal
West Nile virus
Attention to the media and worry over becoming infected
The return of the city-state
Risk society online
| Highly cited | No |
|---|