Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Squeezing dried fruits

Mixed methods, methodological dogmatism and methodological eclecticism

Bibliographic Data

ID20318555
AuthorsVladimir Ilić (0000-0002-3769-7767, University of Belgrade – Faculty of Philosophy, corresponding author)
Year2023
Volume65
Issue1
Pages27-46
Publication date2023-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueSociologija (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0038-0318 • E-ISSN: 2406-0712
PublisherNational Library of Serbia (PUBLISHER • RS)
DOI10.2298/soc220602007i
OpenAlexW4328024217
LanguageEN
References cited19

In this paper the relations among qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches are considered. Basic evidence for this methodological analysis is consisted by Vladan Vidicki`s and Snezana Stojsin`s article and Zivan Ristic`s book devoted to this topic. Vidicki and Stojsin are critics of methodological dogmatism related to rival approach. Their comprehension is analyzed in the first and second sections of the paper. Third section deals with Ristic`s criticism of methodological eclecticism. Forth part of the paper explores particular issue of relations of quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods approach to different paradigms. In the conclusion is stated that division among qulatitative, quantitative and mixed methods approach is artificial and disadvantageous. It is emphasized that the division embarrasses the development of sociological theory and that its focusing to the role of research objectives is related to social reformism

Comprehension · Criticism · Eclecticism · Epistemology · Linguistics · Management science · Multimethodology · Political science · Qualitative research · Social science · Sociology · Engineering · Evaluation and Performance Assessment · Law · Philosophy · Psychology · Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research

  • Integrating Qualitative and Quantitative Methods

    David L Morgan•Integrating Qualitative And…•2014

  • Epistemological and methodological bases of naturalistic inquiry

    Open Access•Egon G Guba, Yvonna S Lincoln•ECTJ•1982

  • Overcoming methodological dogmatism in social sciences

    Open Access•Vladan Vidicki, Snežana Stojšin•Sociologija•2021

  • A critique of the use of triangulation in social research

    Open Access•Norman W H Blaikie, Norman Blaikie•Quality & Quantity•1991

  • Is Mixed Methods Social Inquiry a Distinctive Methodology

    Open Access•Jennifer C Greene•Journal of Mixed Methods Research•2007

  • Transformative Paradigm

    Open Access•Donna M Mertens•Journal of Mixed Methods Research•2007

  • Commentary—After Triangulation, What Next

    Open Access•David L Morgan•Journal of Mixed Methods Research•2018

  • The Research Question in Social Research

    Alan Bryman•International Journal of Social…•2007

  • The Paradigm Wars

    M Hammersley•British Journal of Sociology of…•1992

  • Mixed Methods Research

    Open Access•R Burke Johnson, Anthony J Onwuegbuzie•Educational Researcher•2004

  • Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix

    Donald T Campbell, Donald W Fiske•Psychological Bulletin•1959

  • Practical Strategies for Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Methods

    Open Access•David L Morgan•Qualitative Health Research•1998

  • Moments, Mixed Methods, and Paradigm Dialogs

    Open Access•Norman K Denzin•Qualitative Inquiry•2010

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae