Dados Bibliográficos

AUTOR(ES) James M. Cheverud , Rebecca Rogers Ackermann
ANO 2002
TIPO Artigo
PERIÓDICO American Journal of Physical Anthropology
ISSN 0002-9483
E-ISSN 1096-8644
EDITORA Berghahn Journals (United Kingdom)
DOI 10.1002/ajpa.10038
CITAÇÕES 16
ADICIONADO EM 2025-08-18
MD5 fc775afc018529f3cf0ed5817f12d63c

Resumo

Quantitative genetic theory specifies evolutionary expectations for morphological diversification by genetic drift in a monophyletic clade. If genetic drift is responsible for the evolutionary morphological diversification of a clade, patterns of within‐ and between‐taxon morphological variance/covariance should be proportional. We tested for proportionality of within‐ and between‐species craniofacial morphological variation in 12 species of tamarins (genusSaguinus). We found that within‐ and between‐taxon morphological variations across the entire genus were not proportional, and hence not likely to be due to genetic drift alone. The primary deviation from proportionality is that size and size‐related shape in the cranium is more variable relative to other aspects of cranial morphology than expected under genetic drift, suggesting differential size selection between the two major clades, the small‐bodied and large‐bodied tamarins. Within each of these major clades, most of the interspecific variation is consistent with the pattern expected under genetic drift, although specific contrasts may indicate the involvement of differential selection. Morphological distances among taxa do not correspond very closely to the phylogeny derived from mtDNA. In particular,S. oedipusandS. geoffroyiare very distinct morphologically from the rest of the tamarins, although they are phylogenetically the sister clade to a clade containingS. midasandS. bicolor. Morphological similarity is not a good guide to phylogenetic affinity in the tamarins, especially with regard to deeper nodes in the phylogenetic tree. Am J Phys Anthropol 117:260–271, 2002. © 2002 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Ferramentas