Guilt
Three Models of Therapy
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 20332256 |
|---|---|
| Authors | S Bruce Narramore (Rosemead Graduate School of Psychology, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1974 |
| Volume | 2 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 260-265 |
| Publication date | 1974-09-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Psychology and Theology (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0091-6471 • E-ISSN: 2328-1162 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/009164717400200402 |
| OpenAlex | W2790613774 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 4 |
| References cited | 3 |
After reviewing a dynamic model of guilt interpreted within a theological framework three approaches to guilt reduction are discussed. It is concluded that therapeutic attempts to either improve behavior or modify one's standards leave the major crux of the guilt dilemma untouched. Only a model of guilt reduction that gives primary attention to the nature and origin of the punitive guilt feelings can be fully effective
Dilemma · Epistemology · Feeling · Psychotherapist · Punitive damages · Emotions and Moral Behavior · Law · Philosophy · Psychology · Social Psychology
| Citations per year | 0.08 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 1976 - 2011 (36) |
| Highly cited | No |