Spiritual Concerns in Eric Fromm

Bibliographic Data

ID20332880
AuthorsDaniel A Helminiak (0000-0002-5956-368X, University of Texas Austin, Texas, corresponding author)
Year1988
Volume16
Issue3
Pages222-232
Publication date1988-09-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Psychology and Theology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0091-6471 • E-ISSN: 2328-1162
PublisherSAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/009164718801600302
OpenAlexW2509528009
LanguageEN
Citations received5
References cited7

This article summarizes Erich Fromm's understanding of human nature and pinpoints his account of the human tendency ever to seek further perfection: biological dichotomy results in contradictions that produce existential needs whose various resolutions determine passions and strivings, which are incessant and inherently unquenchable. Though not wholly unambiguous, his position is basically correct. Empirical evidence and logical argument support it. It presupposes a spiritual component in human nature that strives toward what is objectively correct and truly worthwhile, and so it is not only useful as a secular transformation of many traditionally religious concerns but is also open to easy theistic and, ultimately, Christian interpretation. Here is the basis for an account of spirituality that cuts across cultures and religions. Fromm's account of the matter squares well with the more detailed and profound analysis of dynamic human consciousness–-“spirit”–-presented by Bernard J.F. Lonergan (1957, 1972) and used by Daniel Helminiak (1987) to provide a technical nontheistic definition of spiritual development

Argument (complex analysis) · Consciousness · Epistemology · Existentialism · Interpretation (philosophy) · Passions · Perfection · Sociology · Spirituality · Theism · Philosophy · Psychology · Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub