Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Nudge or Grudge? Choice Architecture and Parental Decision‐Making

Bibliographic Data

ID20333607
AuthorsJennifer Blumenthal‐Barby (0000-0003-1054-619X), Douglas J Opel (0000-0001-7021-191X)
Year2018
Volume48
Issue2
Pages33-39
Publication date2018-03-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueThe Hastings Center Report (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0093-0334 • E-ISSN: 1552-146X
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1002/hast.837
PMID29590519
OpenAlexW2794731224
LanguageEN
Citations received5
References cited43

Richard Thaler and Cass Sunstein define a nudge as “any aspect of the choice architecture that alters people's behavior in a predictable way without forbidding any options or significantly changing their economic incentives.” Much has been written about the ethics of nudging competent adult patients. Less has been written about the ethics of nudging surrogates’ decision‐making and how the ethical considerations and arguments in that context might differ. Even less has been written about nudging surrogate decision‐making in the context of pediatrics, despite fundamental differences that exist between the pediatric and adult contexts. Yet, as the field of behavioral economics matures and its insights become more established and well‐known, nudges will become more crafted, sophisticated, intentional, and targeted. Thus, the time is now for reflection and ethical analysis regarding the appropriateness of nudges in pediatrics . We argue that there is an even stronger ethical justification for nudging in parental decision‐making than with competent adult patients deciding for themselves. We give three main reasons in support of this: (1) child patients do not have autonomy that can be violated (a concern with some nudges), and nudging need not violate parental decision‐making authority; (2) nudging can help fulfill pediatric clinicians’ obligations to ensure parental decisions are in the child's interests, particularly in contexts where there is high certainty that a recommended intervention is low risk and of high benefit; and (3) nudging can relieve parents’ decisional burden regarding what is best for their child, particularly with decisions that have implications for public health

Autonomy · Choice architecture · Context (archaeology) · Economics · Incentive · Intervention (counseling) · Nudge theory · Political science · Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life · Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare · Law · Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues · Psychology · Social Psychology

  • A Qualitative Study on Nudging and Palliative Care

    Open Access•Ludovica De Panfilis, Carlo Peruselli et al.•International Journal of…•2021

  • Nudging Children and Adolescents toward Online Privacy

    Mariana Veretilnykova, Leyla Dogruel•Journal of Media Ethics•2021

  • Public acceptability of nudges targeting parents and children to improve children's health outcomes

    Open Access•Olivier Drouin•Behavioural Public Policy•2020

  • Nudge in perspective

    Open Access•Paul Kuyer, Bert Gordijn•Rationality and Society•2023

  • The gentle push based on a “nudging approach

    Open Access•Alessia Dorigoni, Nicolao Bonini•Mind & Society•2025

  • Salvaging the concept of nudge

    Yashar Saghai•Journal of Medical Ethics•2013

  • The Impact of Social Networks on Parents’ Vaccination Decisions

    E K Brunson•PEDIATRICS•2013

  • Prospection

    Open Access•Daniel T Gilbert, Timothy D Wilson•Science•2007

  • Patient preferences for shared decisions

    Open Access•Betty Chewning, Carma L Bylund et al.•Patient Education and Counseling•2012

  • When choice is demotivating

    Sheena S Iyengar, Mark R Lepper•Journal of Personality and Social…•2000

  • Manipulation in the Enrollment of Research Participants

    Open Access•Amulya Mandava, Joseph Millum•The Hastings Center Report•2013

  • Nudge

    Open Access•Richard V Adkisson•The Social Science Journal•2008

  • The Influence of Provider Communication Behaviors on Parental Vaccine Acceptance and Visit Experience

    Douglas J Opel, Rita Mangione‐smith et al.•American Journal of Public Health•2015

  • Availability

    Open Access•Amos Tversky, Daniel Kahneman•Cognitive Psychology•1973

Citations per year0.83
Citation span2020 - 2025 (6)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae