Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The Virtues of National Ethics Committees

Bibliographic Data

ID20333637
AuthorsJonathan Montgomery (0000-0002-4592-0930, corresponding author)
Year2017
Volume47
IssueS1
PagesS24-S27
Publication date2017-05-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueThe Hastings Center Report (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0093-0334 • E-ISSN: 1552-146X
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1002/hast.715
PMID28543658
OpenAlexW2619354102
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited4

The United Kingdom has many bodies that play their part in carrying out the work of national ethics committees, but its nearest equivalent of a U.S. presidential bioethics commission is the Nuffield Council on Bioethics, established in 1991. The Council is charged with examining ethical questions raised by developments in biological and medical research, publishing reports, and making representations to appropriate bodies in order to respond to or anticipate public concern. It is a nongovernment organization with no defined or guaranteed channels of influence. It has no authority merely by virtue of the position it holds. Rather, it has established relational authority based on its reputation. Unlike the U.S. bioethics commission, it is not part of executive government, nor is it constituted to contribute to the legislative branch, as does the French Comité Consultatif National d'Ethique. Its nongovernmental status notwithstanding, the Nuffield Council's work affects the U.K. government and the British public, and the Council has achieved international recognition for its reports. I was the chairperson from 2012 to 2017 and draw on my experience in this piece to consider three key audiences: governments, publics, and the international community

Bioethics · Commission · Government (linguistics) · Legislature · Political science · Politics · Presidential system · Reputation · Sociology · Virtue · Biomedical Ethics and Regulation · Ethics in Clinical Research · Ethics in medical practice · Law · Public Administration

  • Is routine prenatal screening and testing fundamentally incompatible with a commitment to reproductive choice? Learning from the historical context

    Open Access•Panagiota Nakou•Medicine Health Care and Philosophy•2021

  • Ethics-policy advisory ecosystems

    Open Access•Jessica Pykett, Marija Antanavičiūtė et al.•Contemporary Social Science•2026

  • Policy-Development and Deference to Moral Experts

    Open Access•Jakob Elster•Res Publica. Revista de Historia…•2023

Citations per year0.6
Citation span2021 - 2026 (6)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae