Another Roadblock to Including Women in Research
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 20335099 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Laura Guidry‐Grimes (0000-0002-2008-1034, Georgetown University), Elizabeth Victor (0000-0001-8537-7189) |
| Year | 2012 |
| Volume | 42 |
| Issue | 5 |
| Pages | 1p following 48-1p following 48 |
| Publication date | 2012-09-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The Hastings Center Report (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0093-0334 • E-ISSN: 1552-146X |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1002/hast.80 |
| PMID | 22976414 |
| OpenAlex | W2011669748 |
| Language | EN |
Scientists, clinicians, and bioethicists are worried about how so‐called personhood measures would limit access to certain types of contraception, research involving stem cells, and access to fertility treatments. While these measures have been struck down in Colorado, South Dakota, California, and Mississippi, the bill signed into law in Oklahoma in February deserves critical scrutiny, particularly into the ways these legal measures influence eligibility for clinical research. Oklahoma's bill states that the laws of the state “shall be interpreted and construed to acknowledge on behalf of the unborn child at every stage of development all the rights, privileges, and immunities available to other persons, citizens, and residents of this state.”
Personhood · Political science · Scrutiny · Sociology · State (computer science) · Diversity and Career in Medicine · Health and Medical Research Impacts · Law · Reproductive Health and Technologies
| Highly cited | No |
|---|