Work Requirements That Don't Work
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 20335565 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Stephen R Latham (0000-0002-3036-1400, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2018 |
| Volume | 48 |
| Issue | 6 |
| Pages | 5-6 |
| Publication date | 2018-11-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The Hastings Center Report (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0093-0334 • E-ISSN: 1552-146X |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1002/hast.928 |
| PMID | 30586178 |
| OpenAlex | W2905982785 |
| Language | EN |
Early in 2018, the Trump administration's Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services issued a guidance letter outlining a new and controversial kind of Medicaid waiver proposal. The administration invited states to propose waivers that would impose work (or other “community engagement”) requirements as a condition of eligibility for Medicaid. The Trump administration and state proponents of work requirements want to force able‐bodied Medicaid beneficiaries into the workplace. Critics allege that this is because they mistakenly believe that low‐income individuals are not working because they're lazy or because aid programs provide them with a disincentive to work. Proponents respond that the requirements can lower the public programs' costs while helping its recipients. Medicaid data seems to show that the work‐requirement proposals are a solution in search of a real‐life problem
Administration (probate law) · Business · Health care · Medicaid · Political science · Public relations · State (computer science) · Waiver · Work (physics) · Computer Science · Employment and Welfare Studies · Engineering · Law · Public Administration
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |