Reproductive Embryo Editing
Attending to Justice
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 20335676 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Inmaculada De Melo-Martín (0000-0001-8656-8497, corresponding author), Inmaculada de Melo‐Martín |
| Year | 2022 |
| Volume | 52 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 26-33 |
| Publication date | 2022-07-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The Hastings Center Report (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0093-0334 • E-ISSN: 1552-146X |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1002/hast.1406 |
| PMID | 35993107 |
| OpenAlex | W4292572498 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 24 |
The use of embryonic genome editing tools is often touted as a way to ensure the birth of healthy and genetically related children. Many would agree that this is a worthy goal. Yet the purpose of this article is to argue that, if we are concerned with justice, accepting such a goal as morally appropriate commits one to rejecting the use of social resources for further development of embryo editing for reproductive purposes. This is so because there are safer and more effective means that can allow many more prospective parents to achieve the same valued goal and that can offer additional benefits
Biology · Computer security · Economic Justice · Genome · Genome editing · Internet privacy · Law and economics · Political science · Public relations · SAFER · Social justice · Sociology · Biomedical Ethics and Regulation · Computer Science · CRISPR and Genetic Engineering · Genetics · Law · Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations · Psychology
| Citations per year | 0.33 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2023 - 2023 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |