Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Clarifying the Concepts of Research Ethics

Datos Bibliográficos

ID20337293
AutoresRobert J Levine (Yale University, autor de correspondencia)
Año1979
Volumen9
Número3
Páginas21
Fecha de publicación1979-06-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessNo
TipoARTICLE
RevistaThe Hastings Center Report (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0093-0334 • E-ISSN: 1552-146X
EditorialJSTOR (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.2307/3560793
PMID478836
OpenAlexW2052882141
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas11

O ne of the most important achievements of the National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research (the Commission) was to begin the process of correcting the conceptual and semantic errors that had undermined virtually all previous attempts to develop rational public policy on research involving human subjects. The fruits of this achievement are seen most clearly in the later reports of the Commission-on children,1 on those institutionalized as mentally infirm,2 and on Institutional Review Boards (IRBs).3 Earlier reports, for example, on the fetus,4 were flawed in several respects5 because they were prepared before the Commission had completed its conceptual clarifications. Four of these clarifications are especially important. The Commission (1) developed satisfactory definitions of research and practice; (2) abandoned the distinction between therapeutic and nontherapeutic research; (3) clarified the concept of risk; and (4) identified the different purposes of informed consent and the consent form

Engineering ethics · Environmental ethics · Epistemology · Research ethics · Sociology · Engineering · Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare · Ethics in Clinical Research · Ethics in medical practice · Philosophy · Psychology

  • Therapy or Research

    Francis Rolleston, James R Miller•IRB Ethics and Human Research•1981

  • The Senate's Proposed Statutory Definition of 'Voluntary and Informed Consent

    Robert J Levine•IRB Ethics and Human Research•1980

  • The Research‐Treatment Distinction

    Open Access•Norman Ka, Nancy E Kass et al.•The Hastings Center Report•2013

  • A Critique of Clinical Equipoise

    Franklin G Miller, Howard Brody•The Hastings Center Report•2003

  • Taking the principle of the primacy of the human being seriously

    Open Access•Joanna Różyńska•Medicine Health Care and Philosophy•2021

  • The ethics of innovation for Alzheimer’s disease

    Open Access•Timothy Daly, Ignacio Mastroleo et al.•Metamedicine•2020

  • Should All Research Subjects Be Treated the Same

    Open Access•Baruch A Brody, Baruch Brody et al.•The Hastings Center Report•2015

  • The Research-Clinical Practice Distinction, Learning Health Systems, and Relationships

    Open Access•Howard Brody, Franklin G Miller•The Hastings Center Report•2013

  • Patient attitudes following participation in a health outcome survey

    D P Funch, Donnie Funch et al.•American Journal of Public Health•1981

  • Attention au chercheur ! L’éthique sous la menace de la recherche, la science sous l’emprise des comités d’éthique en recherche

    Maritza Felices-Luna•Déviance et Société•2016

  • Ethical complications of clinical therapeutic research on children

    Open Access•David C Thomasma, Alvin M Mauer•Social Science & Medicine•1982

Obras citantes distintas11
Citas por año0,24
Intervalo de citas1980 - 2021 (42)
Velocidad de citaciónhistorical
Altamente citadoNo
Tipos de citaNeutras: 7
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae