Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Not with a Bang, but a Whimper

Sherley v. Sebelius

Bibliographic Data

ID20337651
AuthorsDena S Davis (0009-0003-4355-1742, corresponding author)
Year2013
Volume43
Issue1
Pages17-18
Publication date2013-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueThe Hastings Center Report (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0093-0334 • E-ISSN: 1552-146X
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1002/hast.127
PMID23315848
OpenAlexW2078558981
LanguageEN
References cited1

After a tortuous legal process that resembled nothing so much as a game of chutes and ladders, on August 24, 2012, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit decided in favor of the Department of Health and Human Services' position that human embryonic stem cell research is not research that harms embryos, and therefore is not a violation of the Dickey‐Wicker Amendment. Bioethicists have been following this case because of our interest in the ethics and politics of embryonic stem cell research, but the final decision hinged largely on a series of rather arcane points of law and procedure

Biology · Embryonic stem cell · Human services · Law and economics · Nothing · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Law · Legal Systems and Judicial Processes · Philosophy

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae