Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Can Others Exercise an Incapacitated Patient's Right to Die

Bibliographic Data

ID20338385
AuthorsIra Mark Ellman (Arizona State University, corresponding author)
Year1990
Volume20
Issue1
Pages47
Publication date1990-01-01
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueThe Hastings Center Report (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0093-0334 • E-ISSN: 1552-146X
PublisherJSTOR (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.2307/3562978
PMID2312272
OpenAlexW2072972343
LanguageEN

Ellman's article is one of four in this issue of the Hastings Center Report on the first right to die case to come before the U.S. Supreme Court. The author, a law professor, agrees with critics that the Missouri Supreme Court erred in Cruzan when it declined to grant the parents of a woman in a persistent vegetative state authority to halt her tube feedings. However, he believes that in order to overturn Cruzan, the U.S. Supreme Court would have to wrongly and dangerously hold that Missouri is obliged to follow the family's instructions, even if Cruzan's wishes are unknown. Ellman warns against recognizing a third party's claim to exercise an individual's constitutional right to decide about medical care on her behalf. He argues that this right, emerging from a principle of self determination, can apply only to decisions concerning oneself, and cannot be exercised by another

Constitutional right · Political science · Right to die · Sociology · State (computer science) · Supreme court · Computer Science · Ethics in medical practice · Law

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae