A Tale of Two Royal Cities
The Narratives of Islamists' Intolerance in Yogyakarta and Solo
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 20339746 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Muhammad Najib Azca (Universitas Gadjah Mada), Hakimul Ikhwan (0000-0001-9881-8860, Universitas Gadjah Mada), Mohammad Zaki Arrobi (Universitas Gadjah Mada) |
| Year | 2019 |
| Volume | 57 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 25-50 |
| Publication date | 2019-06-29 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Al-Jami ah Journal of Islamic Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0126-012X • E-ISSN: 2338-557X |
| Publisher | Al-Jamiah Research Centre (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.14421/ajis.2019.571.25-50 |
| OpenAlex | W2977757506 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 3 |
| References cited | 18 |
The article discusses the narratives of “Islamist” intolerance in two cities of Yogyakarta and Solo in the post-Suharto era. It aims to elucidate the multiplicity of intolerance acts and the complexity of underpinning factors to intolerance. It argues that Islamist intolerance has manifested in various forms, ranging from the ideological, instrumental, and symbolic form. However, these categorizations of ideological, instrumental, and symbolic are not clear-cut and permanent one, but there is always some possible overlap between them. There is also the possibility that the form of intolerance can change in different times and occasions. This study is based on fieldwork research taken during 2014-2016 in both cities. Methodologically, this research-based article used Extended Cased Method (ECM). The data was collected by employing indepth interview and participant observation with secondary sources such as local media and government documents.[Tulisan ini membahas narasi Islam intoleran di dua kota, Solo dan Yogyakarta, pasca rezim Soeharto. Selain itu juga menjelaskan sejumlah aksi intoleran dan kompleksitas faktor-faktor yang berkelindan dalam peristiwa tersebut. Tulisan ini mengajukan argumen bahwa Islam intoleran mempunyairagam bentuk, mulai dari ideologis, instrumentalis hingga simbolis. Meskipun demikian, kategori tersebut tidak bersifat kaku dan permanen, tetapi terkadang bersifat saling overlap satu sama lainnya. Ada kemungkinan juga bentuk intoleran berubah seiring dengan perubahan waktu dan kondisi. Kajian ini berdasarkan pada studi lapangan di dua kota pada rentang waktu 2014-2016. Secara metodologi kajian ini menggunakan pendekatan Extended Cased Method (ECM). Data dikumpulkan melalui serangkaian wawancara mendalam dan observasi partisipatif dengan didukung data sekunder dari arsip daerah dan sejumlah media surat kabar lokal.]
Art · Humanities · Ideology · Islam · Literature · Narrative · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Theology · COVID-19 Prevention and Impact · Islamic Finance and Communication · Islamic Studies and Radicalism · Law · Philosophy
Ethnography unbound
Deliberative Democracy or Agonistic Pluralism?
Java, Indonesia and Islam
Islamism and Democracy in Indonesia
Islamism in Indonesia
Islam and the Secular State in Indonesia
Islamising Indonesia
The Left and Indonesia’s 1960s
Genealogies of Islamic Radicalism in Post-Suharto Indonesia
Explaining Anti-Chinese Riots in Late 20th Century Indonesia
Laskar Jihad
The Dutch Colonial System in the East Indies
Contemporary Developments in Indonesian Islam
What a Good Idea! Ideologies and Frames in Social Movement Research
Shaping Shiʿa Identities in Contemporary Indonesia between Local Tradition and Foreign Orthodoxy
Towards a Sociological Understanding of Islamic Radicalism in Indonesia
Java in a Time of Revolution. Occupation and Resistance 1944-1946
Resource Mobilization and Social Movements
| Unique citing works | 3 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0.6 |
| Citation span | 2021 - 2023 (3) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 1 |