Israel-Egypt Agreements of 1974–1975 in the Context of Regional and International Relations
A New Perspective
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 20339804 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Alek D Epstein (0000-0003-1187-2405, corresponding author), Alek Epstein (Center for Israel and Diaspora studies; Discovery Routes – Israeli Experience through History, Art and Culture) |
| Year | 2021 |
| Issue | 6 |
| Pages | 149 |
| Publication date | 2021-01-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Novaia i noveishaia istoriia (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0130-3864 • E-ISSN: 3034-6002 |
| Publisher | The Russian Academy of Sciences (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.31857/s013038640017187-3 |
| OpenAlex | W4206344128 |
| Language | EN |
After the October 1973 War president Sadat had come to realize the United States alone could lead to an Israeli withdrawal from the territories it occupying during the June 1967 War. For although the Soviet Union supplied Egypt with the desirable types and amounts of weapons, Moscow had no impact on Israeli policy. US Secretary of State Henry Kissinger saw the United States gaining clout in the Middle East while pushing the Soviet Union out of the region. Kissinger succeeded to bring about the signing of two separation of forces agreements between Israel and Egypt, in January 1974 and in September 1975; the second Disengagement Agreement even placed American troops in the Sinai Peninsula to monitor the demilitarized zones established between the two countries. In both cases the United States had resorted to exerting pressure on the Israeli government lead by Golda Meir (in 1974) and Yitzhak Rabin (in 1975) by denying financial aid and holding no discussions on weapon transactions. Neither in 1974 nor in 1975 president Sadat was willing to recognize Israel or to sign a peace agreement with the Jewish state. In fact, he was involved in a “step-by-step peace process” with the United States rather than with Israel. American administration had no doubt that Israel would have no choice but “to pay the bills”, whatever they would be
Context (archaeology) · Disengagement theory · Economic history · Peninsula · Political science · State (computer science) · Historical Geopolitical and Social Dynamics · History · Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies · Law · Metallurgy and Cultural Artifacts
| Highly cited | No |
|---|