Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Modern Historiography of the NEP

A Century Was Not Enough

Bibliographic Data

ID20339827
AuthorsMikhail Feldman (0000-0002-1999-1663, Ural Institute of Management, corresponding author)
Year2022
Issue3
Pages27
Publication date2022-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueNovaia i noveishaia istoriia (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0130-3864 • E-ISSN: 3034-6002
PublisherThe Russian Academy of Sciences (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.31857/s013038640020234-5
OpenAlexW4285301463
LanguageEN
Citations received1

The article, based on an examination of an array of publications by researchers in academic journals, focuses on the extent to which the new economic policy in the USSR has been studied. The author highlights the most difficult aspects of the problem, namely the quality of self-organisation, the interaction of the sectors of the NEP economy, the effectiveness of control “from the top”, which indeed raised many questions among politicians, scholars and specialists in the late 1920s and among historians for many decades. The analysis suggests that there is a distinctive historiographical bridge between the best historical studies of the Soviet era and those of the first decades of the twenty-first century. The main achievement of the historical research on the problem has been to reveal the scale of the difficulties of an ideological, financial and personnel nature that arose during the years of the NEP, primarily in agriculture. Historians have justifiably pointed out the low profitability of public sector enterprises. The possibility of implementing an industrial project on the basis of the New Economic Policy remains a controversial issue in the academic literature. At the same time, a study of the combinaion of factors that led to the adoption of the first five-year plan demonstrates the potential of the multilayered economy of the 1920s, refuting the thesis of the “backwardness” and “doom” of the NEP. The analysis of historiographical writings on the NEP leads to the conclusion that in recent years this period has reverted to a relatively neglected research area in contemporary academic literature: studies on the historical methodology of Bolshevism and Stalinism have been suspended; characteristic is the absence of major works on the “new economic policy” as a system in the context of the political, social and economic development of Soviet society. The article systematises and elaborates on overlooked and little-studied problems

Backwardness · Comparative historical research · Economic growth · Economics · Geography · Historiography · Ideology · Political science · Politics · Scale (ratio) · Social science · Sociology · History · Law · Russia and Soviet political economy

  • Concession Policy in the Crosshairs of Revolutionary Self-Consciousness

    Open Access•Olga M Morozova, T I Troshina•RUDN Journal of Russian History•2023

Unique citing works1
Citations per year0.33
Citation span2023 - 2023 (1)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 1

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae