A non-stranding approach to resumption
Evidence from South Asia
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 20344187 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Youssef A Haddad (0000-0002-2522-0662, University of Florida, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2010 |
| Volume | 27 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Publication date | 2010-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The Linguistic Review (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0167-6318 • E-ISSN: 1613-3676 |
| Publisher | Walter de Gruyter GmbH (PUBLISHER • DE) |
| DOI | 10.1515/tlir.2010.005 |
| OpenAlex | W2063584620 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 8 |
Two types of resumption are argued for in the literature: (i) base-generated resumption and (ii) resumption as movement (Aoun et al., Linguistic inquiry 32: 371–403, 2001; Boeckx, Islands and chains: Resumption as stranding, John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2003). The latter is analyzed as involving stranding. A DP merges in its base position with a resumptive element adjoined to it. Movement targets the DP, while the resumptive element is left behind – or stranded. This article presents evidence from Copy Control in Telugu to show that a stranding approach fails to account for movement-related resumption in this South Asian language. As an alternative, the article offers a non-stranding account and extends it to another South Asian language, Assamese
Aesthetics · Assamese · Linguistics · Political science · Computer Science · History · Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies · Law · Linguistics and Discourse Analysis · Mathematics · Philosophy · Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
Linearization of Chains and Sideward Movement
Copy Control in Telugu
Movement and Control
Expanding the Scope of Control and Raising
The double-object construction, domain asymmetries, and linear precedence
Multiple Case Checking
Resumption, Movement, and Derivational Economy
The Semantic Basis of Control in English
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |